In a recent post, we explained that the Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) had declared its intention to move forward with “no-contest settlements.” These agreements would permit the settlement of enforcement proceedings without requiring the respondent to admit to any misconduct.

Last week, the OSC announced that it had negotiated two no-contest settlement agreements with accounting firm Ernst & Young (“E&Y”). The agreements relate to cases in which E&Y had performed audit work for two now-defunct Chinese-based companies: Sino-Forest Corporation and Zungui Haixi Corporation. A hearing was held on September 30, 2014, during which a panel of OSC Commissioners approved the settlements.

E&Y previously entered into settlement agreements with Sino-Forest and Zungui investors. As such, in negotiating its agreements, the OSC took into account that E&Y had already agreed to pay $119 million to investors.  With respect to its work for Sino-Forest, E&Y agreed to pay $6.5 million to the OSC, of which approximately $1.5-2 million will be put toward reimbursing the OSC for expenses incurred during its investigation. The remainder will be allocated to third parties at the OSC’s discretion. The money may be used to fund causes related to the OSC’s work, such as an investor education fund. With respect to its work for Zungui, E&Y has agreed to pay $1.5 million.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of John Pirie John Pirie

John Pirie leads Baker McKenzie’s Canadian litigation and government enforcement group and is a member of the North American group’s Steering Committee. A Chambers ranked trial lawyer, he handles complex business disputes, investigations and white-collar matters, particularly those with multi-jurisdictional aspects. John’s focus…

John Pirie leads Baker McKenzie’s Canadian litigation and government enforcement group and is a member of the North American group’s Steering Committee. A Chambers ranked trial lawyer, he handles complex business disputes, investigations and white-collar matters, particularly those with multi-jurisdictional aspects. John’s focus includes a significant fraud and financial recovery component, having pursued and defended a range of leading cases in the area. He has deep experience with emergency relief measures, including global asset freeze orders and remedies available in bankruptcy and receivership. John has acted for governments, banks, investors, multinational corporations, officers and directors, a stock exchange, a securities regulator, members of the judiciary and an array of professionals. Clients interviewed by Chambers Global say: “John Pirie has an excellent command of the law and clients’ needs and expectations” and “he is an experienced courtroom advocate who is particularly well regarded for his civil fraud expertise.”

Photo of David Gadsden David Gadsden

David Gadsden has deep experience in fraud and financial crime matters.  He is counsel on multijurisdictional fraud investigations, including related civil disputes and regulatory proceedings.  David acted as counsel for a primary defendant in the Sino-Forest litigation, the largest securities fraud class action…

David Gadsden has deep experience in fraud and financial crime matters.  He is counsel on multijurisdictional fraud investigations, including related civil disputes and regulatory proceedings.  David acted as counsel for a primary defendant in the Sino-Forest litigation, the largest securities fraud class action in Canada.  He is known for his pragmatic advice on fraud prevention and investigations, and has extensive expertise in ‘Ponzi scheme’ litigation and asset recapture, including cross-border tracing, Anton Piller orders and Mareva injunctions.  David has been recognized as a “Litigator to Watch” in Lexpert’s annual Guide to the Leading US/Canada Cross-border Litigation Lawyers in Canada and has been ranked in Legal 500 for dispute resolution.